One of the fringe issues of 2011 came roaring to the forefront as the calendar flipped to 2012.

When Allegheny County was forced by a judge to release its first set of property tax reassessment numbers last week, people went indiscriminately crazy as their property values skyrocketed with no rhyme or reason. Even if you weren’t among the first set of new values, the message was clear: This reassessment stuff is a disaster, and no one will be spared by the time it’s all over.

As the public outrage and media frenzy raged, the main question being asked was ‘how come these damn politicians didn’t know this was coming?’

Well, to be perfectly honest, some of us damn politicians have seen this coming for a couple of years now, but unfortunately a large segment of the public ignored the warnings because it wasn’t real to them yet. As more people get insanely inflated assessment figures in Allegheny County, and with another court-ordered reassessment in Washington County looming, more and more people will be paying attention and demanding action. The key is to make sure people understand what they should be demanding to fix the problem.

We have to look past the temptation to worry about the symptoms and focus on treating the disease. The basic reason the reassessment figures are so screwy is because the whole system is fundamentally flawed.

Using the current reassessment system is like building a functioning car out of gummy bears—no matter how hard you try, it’s just never going to work. So how do we treat the disease? We need to adopt a two-part approach to address both the short-term emergency and the long-term systemic problems.

Three years ago, the state House ordered a comprehensive review of the reassessment system in Pennsylvania. The exhaustive report, completed by the non-partisan Legislative Budget and Finance Committee in 2010, was jaw-dropping for anyone who managed to get through all 220 pages.

There were so many different issues to deal with that we needed to take a time-out and determine a comprehensive course of action. Standing in our way were lawyers for local school boards who were pushing in court to complete a reassessment, even though they knew the current system was totally inaccurate.

Although they were unwilling to admit it publicly, these school boards and their lawyers realized they could use a reassessment as a loophole to force a massive (and I do mean massive) tax increase onto people without getting any of the blame. I’ve asked the school boards and their lawyers on many occasions and before they stopped talking to me altogether, they were unable to come up with any other plausible answer to explain their overly aggressive actions.

The lawyers were especially cagey, because they were making big legal fees consisting solely of taxpayer dollars authorized by the school boards and then hiring expensive public relations firms to try and get famous for fighting for the taxpayers while actually doing the exact opposite.

It was sickening to watch.

Last June, I got a resolution passed in the state House that created a comprehensive task force to implement the recommendations of the 2009 report. I also got a bill passed in the state House that would have imposed a moratorium on all court-ordered reassessments until the end of 2012, with the idea being it would be insane to spend money on a reassessment while we’re actively trying to fix the system. The state Senate amended the bill in a way that made it clearly unconstitutional, and Gov. Tom Corbett issued a veto of the bill in July (his first and only veto).

But that was then, when no one was really paying much attention.

Now that everyone is looking for answers, here’s what we can do: First, the Legislature can pass my moratorium bill, HB 166, without amending it; this will stop all court-ordered reassessments for a year so the problem doesn’t get any worse. The bill has been sitting in a committee for a year and could be signed into law in a week if everyone got on board. HB 166 is the bandage to stop the bleeding.

The long-term solution comes in the form of the recommendations of the Reassessment Task Force that has been meeting regularly for months now. The report, which is being written now and will be released within weeks, will spell out numerous regulatory and statutory changes we need to make in order to get the reassessment system under control.

Some of it will seem boring and unsexy, but we didn’t just pull these ideas out of a hat—this is the result of putting the people who really understand this stuff in a room and working together to find solutions to very complex problems.

I’ll have much more to say when the report is released, but until then realize that some of us saw this coming and have been working for years to fix it the best way possible.

We just need the public to support us in finally getting the problems solved, and with everyone suddenly paying attention, we may be able to actually get something done to benefit the people of Pennsylvania.

{ 0 comments }

A Change is Gonna Come

by on December 16, 2011

The green area is the old 46th; the light blue outline shows the new 46th. This means I'm about to lose a whole lot of territory I have represented for over five years.

I sat alone in my tiny office in the East Wing of the State Capitol, focused intently on the 13-inch television tuned to PCN. I have watched or participated in dozens, if not hundreds of hearings in Harrisburg since taking office in 2007, but none quite like this. Most hearings provide useful but not critical information, and there is rarely a sense of urgency. After all, there’s nothing the government does better than hold meetings, right? But this hearing was different. The outcome would fundamentally change my life and the lives of many others, potentially for the next decade. This hearing was the final vote on the Legislative Redistricting Commission.

For those unfamiliar with the process, every ten years we count everyone in the country through the Census. The following year, each state redefines the boundaries of their state legislative and Congressionaldistricts to reflect the shifts in population. In Pennsylvania, it’s not that simple. The process is unbelievably political, and anyone who says otherwise should be secured in a straightjacket and locked up in an asylum.

Federal Congressional boundaries are voted on by the Legislature; since the Republican Party controls both chambers and the Governor’s mansion, the resulting map is drawn in a way to help Republicans win elections (not trying to be partisan, just stating a well-known fact). State legislative districts are somewhat different. As per the Pennsylvania constitution, a five-member panel handles the whole process. The panel is composed of the Democrat and Republican leaders from the State House and Senate, plus a Chairman appointed by the State Supreme Court who is supposed to be impartial.

When the preliminary plan came out last month, it was as though a tsunami had swept through the main rotunda of the Capitol. The plan many of my colleagues and myself were led to believe was agreed to was tossed aside thirty minutes before the vote and replaced with a “stealth map” drawn totally by the Republicans with no input whatsoever from Democrats. The plan was quickly approved on a 3-2 party line vote with the court-appointed Chairman, a Republican judge from Delaware County, casting the swing vote.

In this Preliminary Plan, the lines of my 46th District shifted from primarily Washington County with parts of Allegheny and Beaver Counties to a district composed of a smaller part of Washington County, lots of new territory in Allegheny County and none in Beaver County. Areas I had come to know well and really care about like Avella and Hanover and Burgettstown were gone in the blink of an eye, shifting to the 15th District based out of Beaver County. Even worse, the 45th District had been moved to the other side of the state, leaving the current representative in my district. This potentially sets up a primary challenge between two incumbent legislators in the spring of 2012, something that hasn’t happened in decades.

The worst part about this entire process was the almost total lack of input I had from the very beginning. From the time the preliminary plan was released until the final plan was voted on earlier this week, I tried like a madman to get some of my current territory back. A good example is Burgettstown Borough and some of the surrounding areas; I have a district office there and really did not want to leave under any circumstances, so I sat down and found a way to potentially minimize the changes. My request was flatly refused and no explanation was given.

We opened our first office in Burgettstown five years ago. It's a shame we'll have to leave.

First day of helping constituents in Burgettstown. I had hair back then and everything.

I got my beloved dog Abigail at a park opening in Cross Creek in 2008

And who can forget being crushed by a 93 year old woman at Wii Bowling (it happened).

Our staff intimated to me that the area’s “new” representative from Beaver County, who is a Republican and therefore had a much greater say in the matter, wasn’t interested in my request. As a result, I will likely be forced to close the doors to my Burgettstown district office in the very near future, and the real victims in this process will be the constituents who are losing a local legislator for the sake of politically-motivated mathematics.

Even as I watched the final vote unfold on PCN, I was genuinely terrified my district would end up in a suburban county around Philadelphia, or somewhere in Allentown. Nothing short of moving me to Delaware would have surprised me. When the meeting was over, we received word that our new lists and maps were ready in the Democratic Leader’s office. Hoping for the best but fearing the very worst, I briskly walked up the four flights of steps to find out my fate. My jaw was clenched tighter than I thought possible, and I was more than a little nauseous, but I held it together under the assumption that throwing up on the Leader’s secretary probably wouldn’t help my cause.

Stumbling past my colleagues, I was finally handed a simple manila folder. The contents were not ideal as I had hoped for, nor were they as catastrophic as I had feared. I managed to hang on to some of my Washington County area, but Burgettstown, Avella, Mt. Pleasant, Hanover, Canton, Chartiers and other familiar names were gone, replaced by places like Bridgeville, South Fayette, Carnegie, Crafton, Heidelberg, Scott and Ingram. I could potentially have to face off against the incumbent from the old 45th District, who now lives in my new territory. In an instant, I thought about all the wonderful friends and unfinished business being replaced by new people to meet and new challenges to attack. It was a mix of uncertainty and excitement I hadn’t felt since I was first elected in 2006. Rest assured, I will still be involved in my familiar areas, and I’ll never turn my back on people in need just because of some lines on a map.

Of the many aspects of government I can’t control, this may be one of the most frustrating. It was politics at its very worst, but there’s nothing I can do about it now. I’m approaching 2012 with a renewed focus and commitment to work harder than ever for the people of the 46th District… wherever it may ultimately be.

{ 0 comments }

Is Black Friday Really Just “Occupy Wal-Mart?”

December 1, 2011

TweetI just don’t get Black Friday. I’ve tried to understand but it’s just not happening. Somehow the wonderful holiday of Thanksgiving, designed for us to spend time with family and friends and simply relax, has been unceremoniously cut short because people have to go stand in line outside big-box retail stores in the middle of [...]

Read the full article →

This Is Not “The Right Way” on Marcellus Shale

November 26, 2011

Tweet  Last week, two bills advanced through their respective chambers in the Legislature. Don’t let anyone tell you these bills, Senate Bill 1100 and House Bill 1950, were “the best we could do” on the issue of Marcellus Shale. When you consider all the time spent on the studies, hearings and commissions—coupled with the immense [...]

Read the full article →

Speaking Out for Local Communities on Marcellus Shale

November 15, 2011

TweetEarlier this evening, I spoke on the House floor in opposition to an amendment to HB 1950, which would strip local communities of their right to enact reasonable ordinances on natural gas operations. Here is my speech: Tweet

Read the full article →

The 46th Curveball

November 2, 2011

Tweet Although the work of governing is rarely a game, the comparisons between politics and sports are difficult to avoid. Elections and the political process lend themselves well to sports metaphors—sometimes the comparisons are forced, but often they are spot-on accurate. Earlier this week, I was subjected to my first taste of the legislative redistricting process, [...]

Read the full article →

Building Bridges (literally)

October 27, 2011

TweetLast week, I had the pleasure of attending a ground-breaking on the Montour Trail for two new bridges. Check out the article by Amy McConnell Schaarsmith in the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette for more details. One of the great aspects of the projects we’ve done with the Montour Trail is the great cooperation we’ve enjoyed with both the [...]

Read the full article →

Marcellus Youth Jobs Forum a Success

October 25, 2011

TweetLast week, I joined with my colleague Rep. Brandon Neuman to host a Marcellus Shale Youth Jobs Forum at the Western Area Career and Technology Center in Chartiers Township. The purpose of the forum was to let local guidance counselors learn about skills and requirements kids coming out of high school may need to be [...]

Read the full article →

I Want My Three-Legged Stool Back

October 6, 2011

Tweet Informed public debate is a three-legged stool; in order to stay level, you need all three legs to be stable, equal and somewhat independent of one another. In this equation, the three legs consist of the elected officials, the public and the media— otherwise known as the people who make laws, the people who [...]

Read the full article →

Marcellus Shale Local Impact Fee discussion heats up

October 4, 2011

Tweet With the much-anticipated unveiling of Gov. Corbett’s Marcellus Shale Impact Fee proposal yesterday, I thought it would be a good time to revisit what local elected officials and statewide policy groups had to say on the subject. This video is an abbreviated recap from the August 24 Public Hearing of the Marcellus Municipal Co-op, [...]

Read the full article →